Integrated mission: Difference between revisions

From Peacekeeping references
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Added note of guidance)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Integrated missions emerged following the end of the Cold War after the United Nations increasingly found itself called to engage in complex emergencies with political, military, humanitarian and developmental aspects, though the label itself did not emerge until after the issuance of the [[Brahimi report]] in 2000.<ref>[https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/ud/vedlegg/missions/missions.pdf Eide, Espen Barth et al. Report on Integrated Missions: Independent Study commissioned by the United Nations Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs. 2005]</ref>
Integrated missions emerged following the end of the Cold War after the United Nations increasingly found itself called to engage in complex emergencies with political, military, humanitarian and developmental aspects, though the label itself did not emerge until after the issuance of the [[Brahimi report]] in 2000.<ref>[https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/ud/vedlegg/missions/missions.pdf Eide, Espen Barth et al. Report on Integrated Missions: Independent Study commissioned by the United Nations Executive Committee on Humanitarian Affairs. 2005]</ref>
== Cost-sharing arrangement ==
The salaries and common staff costs for dual/triple-hatted DSRSGs is shared equally between missions and the Resident Coordinator system.<ref>[https://undocs.org/A/70/7/Add.48 A/70/7/Add.48], paragraph 17</ref>
Operational support costs, including official travel, were previously entirely covered by missions but are now covered under the global cost-shared budget as a result of the [[development system reform]].<ref>General Assembly [https://undocs.org/A/RES/71/272 B resolution 71/272B], Section V</ref>


== Documents ==
== Documents ==
Line 7: Line 13:
* [http://repository.un.org/handle/11176/387408 United Nations Policy on Integrated Assessment and Planning] (April 2013)
* [http://repository.un.org/handle/11176/387408 United Nations Policy on Integrated Assessment and Planning] (April 2013)
* [http://repository.un.org/handle/11176/387407 Integrated Assessment and Planning Handbook] (December 2013)
* [http://repository.un.org/handle/11176/387407 Integrated Assessment and Planning Handbook] (December 2013)
* [https://undocs.org/A/70/703 A/70/703] Proposed United Nations Secretariat contribution to the United Nations Development Group cost-sharing arrangement for the resident coordinator system


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 08:31, 14 May 2020

A structurally-integrated mission is a mission (either peacekeeping or political) in which one of the deputy heads of mission simultaneously serves as the resident coordinator, who leads the United Nations country team, and—in some cases—also the humanitarian coordinator, who is responsible for leading and coordinating the efforts of humanitarian organizations (both UN and non-UN). Both peacekeeping and special political missions can be integrated missions.

Integrated missions emerged following the end of the Cold War after the United Nations increasingly found itself called to engage in complex emergencies with political, military, humanitarian and developmental aspects, though the label itself did not emerge until after the issuance of the Brahimi report in 2000.[1]

Cost-sharing arrangement

The salaries and common staff costs for dual/triple-hatted DSRSGs is shared equally between missions and the Resident Coordinator system.[2]

Operational support costs, including official travel, were previously entirely covered by missions but are now covered under the global cost-shared budget as a result of the development system reform.[3]

Documents

See also

References