Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations

The Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations, or C-34, is a subsidiary body of the General Assembly mandated to consider the whole question of peacekeeping operations in all their (sic) aspects. Its annual report is considered by the Fourth Committee of the General Assembly.

History

Financial crisis

United Nations peacekeeping reached a state of crisis in the 1960s as a result of the refusal of a number of Member States to pay their share of the expenses of the United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF I) and the United Nations Operation in the Congo (ONUC). A number of measures were taken by the General Assembly in an attempt to address the impasse, including requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice in 1961 (see Certain Expenses of the United Nations); adopting resolution 1874(S-IV) of 27 June 1963 on principles for sharing the costs of peacekeeping operations; and deciding that the costs of the newly-established United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) would be met by troop-contributing countries, the government of Cyprus and through voluntary contributions as per Security Council resolution 186(1964).

The General Assembly also adopted resolution 2006(XIX) of 18 February 1965 to establish a special committee on peace-keeping operations with a mandate "to undertake as soon as possible a comprehensive review of the whole question of peace-keeping operations in all their aspects, including ways of overcoming the present financial difficulties of the Organization". This special committee convened for the first time on 26 March 1965 .

Committee of 34

In 1989, China (PRC) became the 34th member of the Committee, leading to the informal designation as the Committee of 34, or "C34". The 34 members were as follows: Afghanistan, Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Denmark, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, France, German Democratic Republic, Guatemala, Hungary, India, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Mauritania, Mexico, Netherlands, Nigeria, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Sierra Leone, Spain, Thailand, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela and Yugoslavia

The membership of the committee was not expanded until 1997.

Sexual exploitation and abuse

Between 2005 and 2007, the C-34 convened resumed sessions to address issues related to sexual exploitation and abuse. The C-34 considered the Zeid report (A/57/710) during its 2005 resumed session, issues related to victims assistance during both of its resumed sessions in 2006 and issues related to the revised model memorandum of understanding during its first resumed session in 2006 and its 2007 resumed session.

Membership

The criteria for membership in the C-34 was established in resolution 51/136 of 13 December 1996, in which the General Assembly

4. Decides to expand the membership of the Special Committee in accordance with the provisions of its report; those Member States which are past or present personnel contributors to United Nations peacekeeping operations and those which were observers at the 1996 session of the Special Committee shall, upon request in writing to the Chairman of the Committee, become members at its 1997 session;

5. Decides also that those Member States which become personnel contributors to United Nations peacekeeping operations in years to come or participate in the future in the Special Committee for three consecutive years as observers shall, upon request in writing to the Chairman of the Committee, become members at the following session of the Committee;

In 2019, there were 154 members of the C-34 .

Bureau and Secretariat

The bureau of the C-34 consists of the following six countries:

• Chair: Nigeria (since 1972)
• Vice-Chair: Canada (since 1966)
• Vice-Chair: Argentina (since 1988)
• Vice-Chair: Poland (since 1991)
• Rapporteur: Egypt (since 1966)

From 2007-2018, secretariat services for the C-34 were provided by the Department of General Assembly and Conference Management while substantive support was provided by the Department of Peacekeeping Operations and Department of Field Support.

Working Methods

The C-34 takes its decisions by consensus.

Originally, the report of the C-34 was drafted by the Rapporteur as a summary of the deliberations of the C-34.

In recent years, however, the structure of the report has become standardized and the is now drafted not by the Rapporteur, but by a Working Group of the Whole, which includes the entire membership of the C-34 and is chaired by Canada. Since 2014, only part of the report is negotiated each year under what is referred to as the "stabilization" process; the part not negotiated is carried over from the previous year's report.

As of 2018, the structure of the C-34 report is as follows:

Section name	First introduced	Notes
Introduction
Guiding principles, definitions and implementation of mandates
Restructuring of peacekeeping	2008 report	Section created following the restructuring of DPKO and the establishment of DFS in 2007
Safety and security
Conduct and discipline	2005 report	Section created following allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse in the United Nations Organization Mission in the DRC (MONUC)
Strengthening operational capacity		Section covers issues related to military and police components in peacekeeping missions
Strategies for complex peacekeeping operations		Section covers tasks mandated by the Security Council
Cooperation with troop-contributing and police-contributing countries
Triangular cooperation among the Security Council, the Secretariat and the troop-contributing and police-contributing countries
Cooperation with regional arrangements
Enhancement of African peacekeeping capacities
Developing stronger United Nations field support arrangements	2010 report	Section created to provide C-34 views on the Global Field Support Strategy
Best practices and training	2012 report	Prior to 2012, "Best practices" and "Training" were two separate sections
Personnel
Financial issues
Other matters

Recent C-34 reports

Year	Report	Notes
2019	A/72/19	Procedural report; committee failed to reach agreement on substantive matters
2018	A/72/19
2017	A/71/19
2016	A/70/19
2015	A/69/19
2014	A/68/19	First report negotiated under stabilization process
2013	A/67/19	Procedural report; committee failed to reach agreement on substantive matters
2012	A/66/19
2011	A/65/19
2010	A/64/19
2009	A/63/19
2008	A/62/19
2007	A/61/19/Rev.1	Covers 2006 2nd resumed and 2007 substantive and resumed sessions
2006	A/60/19/Rev.1	Covers 2006 substantive and resumed sessions (strategy for victim assistance and model memorandum of understanding)
2005	A/59/19/Rev.1	Covers 2005 substantive and resumed sessions (Zeid report)
2004	A/58/19
2003	A/57/767
2002	A/56/863
2001	A/55/1024 and A/55/1024/Corr.1
2000	A/54/839 and A/C.4/55/6	Extraordinary session convened to consider recommendations of the Brahimi report